ROI calculator

A real number — not a marketing number.

Enter your actual spend, your current forecast variance, and how much time your team loses to reconciliation. We'll show you the conservative annual benefit InstantViewAI typically delivers.

Your numbers

All inputs stay in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Combined cloud (GCP/AWS/Azure) + AI provider spend.
How far off your cloud forecast is each quarter. Industry average: 22%.
Time your team spends each month attributing cost to org units.
Senior finance / FinOps loaded rate. Typical range €100–€180/hr.
For AI-impact estimate. Growing fast — most teams underestimate this.
How we calculate. Waste & over-provisioning surfaced: tighter forecasts (from your current variance down to a 5% target) expose over-provisioned and idle spend earlier and right-size commitments — we credit only 25% of that gap as cash actually avoided, not the whole swing. Hours saved: 80% of recon time recovered at your hourly rate. AI value (shown separately, not in payback): an indicative Layer-3 outcome uplift of 8 pts on AI spend — value identified, not euros off the bill.
Estimated annual benefit
€ —
Adjust the inputs to see your estimate.
Payback range
Against the €18k – €150k / year platform-fee range
Waste cut / yr
AI value / yr
Hours returned / yr
Breakdown
Waste & over-provisioning surfaced

Tighter forecasts (variance 22% → 5%) catch over-provisioned, idle and mis-committed spend earlier. We bank only 25% of the gap as cash avoided.

€0
per year
Reconciliation hours recovered

80% of recon time eliminated through automated allocation + Virtual Tags.

€0
per year
AI value identified value, not cash saved

Indicative +8 pt outcome uplift on AI workloads (Layer 3–4). Shown for context — excluded from the payback range because it's value created, not euros off the bill.

€0
per year
Methodology & assumptions+

Conservative by design. Most calculators inflate. This one understates.

  • Waste & over-provisioning (cash): (current_variance − 5%) × annual_spend × 25% capture rate. A tighter forecast doesn't save money on its own — the saving is the over-provisioned, idle and mis-committed spend it lets you catch and cut earlier. The 25% is the share of that gap we credit as cash actually avoided; the remaining 75% is planning accuracy, which we deliberately don't count.
  • Hours benefit (cash): monthly_hours × 80% × 12 × hourly_rate. The 80% is what InstantViewAI customers typically reclaim from automated allocation, reporting and Virtual Tags.
  • AI value identified (not cash): ai_share × annual_spend × 8% (indicative Layer 3 outcome uplift from outcome verification — see AI Impact framework). This is value created, so it is shown for context but excluded from the payback calculation.
  • Payback range: measured against the hard cash benefit only (waste + hours), so you're never paying a subscription out of soft value. Derived from the published platform-fee range (€18k – €150k / year): best case = €18k ÷ cash_benefit × 12, worst case = €150k ÷ cash_benefit × 12. Your actual quoted fee falls inside this range, so your actual payback will too.

No customer data is sent to a server — calculation runs entirely in your browser. Hit "Email me this estimate" below if you want a PDF summary.

Save this estimate

Email me a one-page PDF.

Same numbers, formatted for a board pack. Sent within the hour.

Want a real quote against these numbers?

A real quote uses your actual cloud, AI, and team data — not slider estimates. One business day turnaround.

Why we're conservative

A CFO will check this math. So we did first.

Industry studies regularly cite 30–35% cloud waste and 30%+ forecast variance. Apptio, CloudHealth and FinOps Foundation surveys put the typical engineering-hour overhead of monthly cloud reconciliation in the 60–120 hour range for mid-market teams. Our model uses the lower bounds and applies a further 25% haircut on top — because every CFO has been burned by a vendor calculator at some point. The point of this tool is to give you a number you can defend in front of your board, not a number that flatters us.